6.01(a)(10) – intentional interference with a thrown ball. easy call
btw, doesn’t it seem like intentional interference with a thrown ball deserves it’s own rule paragraph, rather than just one phrase in an otherwise unrelated section? Literally every single word of 6.01(a)(10) is about interference with a player fielding a batted ball, except ” or intentionally interferes with a thrown ball,”. Not one other word in 6.01(a)(10) is applicable to a thrown ball situation, and nothing else in 6.01(a)(10) requires any judgment of intent.
wouldn’t it make more sense if there was a 6.01(a)(12) “He intentionally interferes with a thrown ball.”?
6.01(a)(10) – intentional interference with a thrown ball. easy call
btw, doesn’t it seem like intentional interference with a thrown ball deserves it’s own rule paragraph, rather than just one phrase in an otherwise unrelated section? Literally every single word of 6.01(a)(10) is about interference with a player fielding a batted ball, except ” or intentionally interferes with a thrown ball,”. Not one other word in 6.01(a)(10) is applicable to a thrown ball situation, and nothing else in 6.01(a)(10) requires any judgment of intent.
wouldn’t it make more sense if there was a 6.01(a)(12) “He intentionally interferes with a thrown ball.”?
Reminds me of Reggie in the World Series.