Batter Inference NOT Called
The Phillies and Diamondbacks played at Chase Field on September 19, 2025. In the top of the sixth, Nick Castellanos struck out looking on a 3-2 pitch from Jalen Beeks with Brandon Marsh on first base and one out. Marsh stole second on the pitch. After Castellanos struck out, he walked into the throwing lane of D-backs catcher Gabriel Moreno. I was asked the following questions: Why wasn’t Castellanos called out for batter interference? Should Marsh also have been called out if Castellanos interfered after striking out?
Ruleball Comments
- To call a batter out for interference, the catcher must make a throw unless a collision occurs between the batter and the catcher.
- The term attempt to throw is not specifically defined, but based on anecdotal evidence, I believe umpires generally expect to see some degree of arm action from the catcher. I don’t think Moreno met that requirement.
- In my opinion, if a batter steps into the path of a catcher who is attempting to retire a runner stealing a base, the catcher should initiate contact with the batter and make a throw—even if it’s not a strong one. When a batter is called out for interference after striking out, both the batter and the runner being played on are declared out.
Rich Marazzi
Rules consultant/analyst: Angels, Dodgers, Mets, Nationals, Orioles, Padres, Phillies, Pirates, Red Sox, Rangers, Royals, Tigers, Twins, White Sox, Yankees, YES, and Chicago Sports Network
Asunto: Inquiry Regarding Application of the Disengagement (Pick-Off) Limit Rule Dear Sir/Madam,
I respectfully request your guidance regarding the correct application of the disengagement (pick-off) limit rule in the following game situation:
With runners on first and third base, during the batter’s plate appearance, the pitcher has already used two disengagements (pick-off attempts or step-offs). On a third pick-off attempt to first base, the runner on first breaks for second base and reaches second base safely.
My question is as follows:
In this circumstance, should the disengagement limit rule be enforced—thereby ruling a balk and awarding home plate to the runner on third base—or should the rule not be applied, considering that the runner on first advanced safely to second base?
I appreciate your time and consideration and look forward to your clarification on this matter.
Respectfully,
Jorge Martínez