October 30, 2025

Batter Inference NOT Called

Understanding batter interference and its application in the Phillies–Diamondbacks game at Chase Field.

Batter Inference NOT Called

The Phillies and Diamondbacks played at Chase Field on September 19, 2025. In the top of the sixth, Nick Castellanos struck out looking on a 3-2 pitch from Jalen Beeks with Brandon Marsh on first base and one out. Marsh stole second on the pitch. After Castellanos struck out, he walked into the throwing lane of D-backs catcher Gabriel Moreno. I was asked the following questions: Why wasn’t Castellanos called out for batter interference? Should Marsh also have been called out if Castellanos interfered after striking out?

Ruleball Comments

  • To call a batter out for interference, the catcher must make a throw unless a collision occurs between the batter and the catcher.
  • The term attempt to throw is not specifically defined, but based on anecdotal evidence, I believe umpires generally expect to see some degree of arm action from the catcher. I don’t think Moreno met that requirement.
  • In my opinion, if a batter steps into the path of a catcher who is attempting to retire a runner stealing a base, the catcher should initiate contact with the batter and make a throw—even if it’s not a strong one. When a batter is called out for interference after striking out, both the batter and the runner being played on are declared out.

Rich Marazzi

Rules consultant/analyst: Angels, Dodgers, Mets, Nationals, Orioles, Padres, Phillies, Pirates, Red Sox, Rangers, Royals, Tigers, Twins, White Sox, Yankees, YES, and Chicago Sports Network

Comments

jmq1224

Asunto: Inquiry Regarding Application of the Disengagement (Pick-Off) Limit Rule Dear Sir/Madam,
I respectfully request your guidance regarding the correct application of the disengagement (pick-off) limit rule in the following game situation:

With runners on first and third base, during the batter’s plate appearance, the pitcher has already used two disengagements (pick-off attempts or step-offs). On a third pick-off attempt to first base, the runner on first breaks for second base and reaches second base safely.

My question is as follows:
In this circumstance, should the disengagement limit rule be enforced—thereby ruling a balk and awarding home plate to the runner on third base—or should the rule not be applied, considering that the runner on first advanced safely to second base?

I appreciate your time and consideration and look forward to your clarification on this matter.

Respectfully,

Jorge Martínez

Have a question or comment for one of our experts?